Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com
The Secret Of Denver International Airport is that it houses the largest underground bunker in the US.
The airport was built in the middle of nowhere despite having a perfectly good, functional airport 19 miles closer to the city. The construction of which went way over budget. And in flat lands they moved about the third of the earth they moved to build the panama canal.
Coincidently located 120 miles from Cheyenne mountain, a well known government underground survival bunker, which is linked by tunnel to the airport 120 miles away.
Inside the airport you will find very strange disturbing paintings. Especially disturbing for an airport. A place where you would think the designers would choose calming images as nervous travellers board airplanes. Instead the sculptures and paintings show the end of the world, people living in basements, refugees above ground, and a man with an eagle and a AK47 killing the dove of peace. Burning bushes and people in coffins. The art shows the true purpose of Denver International airport. An underground shelter to escape what is depicted in the paintings. The end of the world.
Why put these clues in the airport? They want people to survive who have certain types of perceptive skills.
It is not a bad idea to build shelters for any type of natural event. Or as depicted in the paintings a forced destruction of the planet.
Regardless of motive, the building stands with clues to the purpose. They cant tell everyone about it as there is not enough room. They could at lease warn people to build their own shelters or make arrangemetns.
Conspiracy theorists think something’s fishy at Denver International Airport.
Published: August 30, 2007
Published: August 30, 2007
“Have you ever been through the Denver airport? It’s strange. It’s one of the busiest, but I’m telling you, it’s weird. There’s a firestorm of people talking about this thing.”
Especially on June 11, when George Noory devotes all four hours of Coast to Coast, his nationally syndicated talk-radio program dedicated to the “paranormal, extraterrestrial and other topics typically overlooked by more mainstream media outlets,” to a discussion of Denver International Airport. Broadcast on more than 500 affiliate stations, including KHOW, the popular overnight show is the 60 Minutes of conspiracy theories, often with self-educated experts expounding on such subjects as the occult, psychic visions, crop circles, Skull and Bones and apocalyptic predictions. And almost all of these conspiracies intersect at DIA.
For the show this night, a special line is set up for listeners in Colorado. Susan from Denver finds it strange that so many contractors were dismissed during the airport’s construction, and speculates that this was a tactic to prevent workers from understanding the true scope of the project, allowing planners to build a facility six stories underground “without anyone questioning it.” Chris from Indianapolis has heard that the tunnels below DIA were constructed as a kind of Noah’s Ark so that five million people could escape the coming earth change; shaken and earnest, he asks how someone might go about getting on the list.
“Well, you first need a lot of money,” replies guest expert Jay Weidner. “And then you need a lot of influence.”
“And my feeling is that the Denver airport is some kind of cathedral to these guys, a cathedral to the world that they’re making,” Weidner tells the listening audience.
The airport holds more clues. “These murals, which are shown in the film, are a story,” Weidner continues.
“Like a message?” Noory asks. “Are they trying to tell us something? Or are they trying to [rub] it in our face?”
Weidner explains that some high-level factions in Masonic society may be using the murals to alert the general population to the earth-shattering political and environmental changes in store for 2012. Either that, or those factions are amazingly arrogant. Because for Weidner and other conspiracy experts, the symbolism is as explicit as a manifesto.
One mural features three women in coffins surrounded by endangered animals, including a Quetzal bird, named after the Mayan god Quetzalcoatl, in a glass cage — an “extinction message,” Weidner says. The next panel shows children of the world gathered around a “gigantic psychedelic plant of some kind. And they’re all extolling that all the races are going to live together in a world of peace.”
“It’s like the one-world government bylaws,” says Noory.
“To put it bluntly,” he says, putting it bluntly, “It’s going to be a real nail-biter.”
Back in 1994, Leo Tanguma was working in his studio in the Lakeside Mall when a van full of people pulled up.
“And they weren’t hostile,” he recalls. “They asked a lot of questions.” They wanted to know about all the different symbols in the murals that he’d been commissioned to make for the still-unopened DIA. “And I explained it like I explain it to everybody,” the artist says. The first part of the environmental mural is about the ways that humans destroy nature and themselves through destruction and genocide. The second part is about humanity coming together to rehabilitate nature and revive their own compassion.
Tanguma likes to keep things simple. He may be left-wing, but he says he’s not a liberal intellectual. He’s a Christian who thinks of his murals as painted sermons, depicting the virtues of the poor and hardworking, and warning against the evils of greed and violence. Like many painters trained in the Mexican style of mural art, Tanguma gears his work to the street and all of its elements, everyone from businessmen and college professors to people like his parents, who were all but illiterate. The last thing Tanguma wants is for viewers to mistake his meaning.
The visitors stayed for more than an hour, looking around his studio, talking. One of the women asked Tanguma if the airport had told him what to paint. He remembers that, because he remembers how she said it. He told her no, that he was given no instructions on content. And then the visitors began to talk about how the United Nations was another conspiracy to take over the United States.
“How do you figure that?” he asked.
Before they left, they went to the back of their van and pulled out a thick, photocopied book detailing the U.N. conspiracy. They gave Tanguma the book. He knew where it was until about ten years ago, when he moved his studio from the strip mall to a modest house in Arvada where he lives with his wife.
Now that his art has become so central to a growing group of conspiracies, he wishes he could find it.
In the ’90s, Waco and the Oklahoma City bombing massacre both prompted bumps in theorizing, but the events of September 11, 2001, really kicked government coverup conspiracies into high gear. The 9-11 Truth Movement points to purported incongruities in the official explanation of the attacks as proof that the events were actually conducted by elements within the U.S. government. And other large-scale disasters, such as the 2004 tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, have also fallen under the microscope of conspiracy theorists.
It’s not difficult to see why national disasters and global catastrophes would inspire suspicion, but a set of paintings at an airport in middle America? How the Tanguma murals became the focus of such a diverse spectrum of conspiracists is a mystery in itself. Still, whispers of shadowy plots, nefarious schemes and activities ranging from paranormal to extraterrestrial have been tied to DIA since even before it opened in 1995, and the growth of the Internet and the increased interest in conspiracies since 9/11 have combined to pull even the most cryptic oddities from the back of the web to the forefront of the conspiracy networks.
The murals each stretch about 28 feet along wide hallways near the baggage claims on the east and west sides of the rectangular Great Hall. Each is split into two parts by access-area doorways. Painted in the Mexican “muralista” style typified by such artists as Diego Rivera and Jose Orozco, with simplified figures cast in bright, solid colors, the characters in the murals — mostly children of various ethnicities — are portrayed with almost cartoonish qualities and laden with symbolism, such as a boy weeping as he holds a soon-to-be-extinct chipmunk in front of a burning forest. According to the DIA website, the murals function metaphorically as diptychs (hinged tablets of theological artwork and writing often placed on Catholic altars) designed with two simple themes: environmental destruction vs. environmental healing and war vs. peace.
And not all these theorists are Unabomber-like crackpots uploading their hallucinations from basement lairs. Former BBC media personality David Icke, for example, has written twenty books in his quest to prove that the world is controlled by an elite group of reptilian aliens known as the Babylonian Brotherhood, whose ranks include George W. Bush, Queen Elizabeth II, the Jews and Kris Kristofferson. In various writings, lectures and interviews, he has long argued that DIA is one of many home bases for the otherworldly creatures, a fact revealed in the lizard/alien-faced military figure shown in Tanguma’s murals.
“Denver is scheduled to be the Western headquarters of the US New World Order during martial law take over,” Icke wrote in his 1999 book, The Biggest Secret. “Other contacts who have been underground at the Denver Airport claim that there are large numbers of human slaves, many of them children, working there under the control of the reptilians.”
On the other end of the conspiracy spectrum is anti-vaccination activist Dr. Len Horowitz, who believes that global viruses such as AIDS, Ebola, West Nile, tuberculosis and SARS are actually population-control plots engineered by the government. The former dentist from Florida does not speak about 2012 or reptiles — in fact, he sees Icke’s Jewish alien lizards as a Masonic plot to divert observers from the true earthly enemies: remnants of the Third Reich. He even used the mural’s sword-wielding military figure as the front cover of his 2001 book, Death in the Air.
“The Nazi alien symbolizes the Nazi-fascist links between contemporary population controllers and the military-medical-petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel largely accountable for Hitler’s rise to power,” Horowitz explained in a 2003 interview with BookWire. A YouTube video dated last fall shows him standing before a podium as he deconstructs photos of the murals projected onto a large screen. He points to Tanguma’s work as an “expression of the devil-doers’ confidence” in their plan to generate mass genocide of undesirable populations through air-based chemical warfare. The wispy rainbow that extends between the two adjacent murals is a stand-in for lethal toxins sprayed into the atmosphere, he tells the audience, “and as a result, you have dying people, mostly ethnic populations.”
Evangelical Christians have also found messages in the murals. In a 2003 newsletter, biblical research group Cephas Ministry included photos of the murals, along with the caution that they referred to bio-warfare, 9/11 and paganism. “They are frightening to Christians as well as American citizenry since one speaks of death to Christianity as we know it,” the newsletter noted. Another grainy YouTube video shows a speaker alleging that the murals indicate that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has built a concentration camp below the airport to systematically murder the “people that Lucifer hates.”
www.konformist.com managed to connect the DIA conspiracy to JonBenét and the Denver Broncos. Reached by phone at his home in Las Vegas, the site’s creator, Robert Sterling, admits that the best conspiracy theories often necessitate dizzying leaps of logic, demonstrated by a kind of free-association exercise he calls “the conspiracy game.”
Even though Sterling realizes that these connections are more than a little tenuous, he is willing to err on the side of speculation, given the sheer weirdness of the murals and evidence of DIA’s capstone. “The idea that [DIA] is a temple or monument to the New World Order, it almost in some bizarre way makes sense,” he says.
In his sociological observations of conspiracy culture, Barkun has noticed a rise in the number of individuals suspicious of Freemasonry, a trend he thinks may be the cause (or effect) of conspiracy-thriller novelist Dan Brown’s popularity. As with The Da Vinci Code, there’s a belief that the future can be accessed if you can only decipher the code. “It’s often something that’s in plain sight as it is [at DIA]. But their claim is that there’s a hidden meaning,” Barkun says. “Most often it is thought to exist in text; people have long done this with the Bible. But it can often be visual, as in the case of DIA.”
Although conspiracy theories vary widely, they all share three commonalities. “One is the belief that nothing happens by accident,” Barkun points out. “Another is that everything is connected. And a third is that nothing is as it seems.”
Jay Weidner would agree with that. From his office in Seattle, the former National Public Radio talk-show host says that world events like the war in Iraq, the oil crisis and the erosion of global economies signal that a fundamental alteration in human history is on the horizon.
“There’s some profound shift that’s about to happen,” he says. “And for those of us who are prescient and aware and conscious, we can feel there’s something going on here.” And they can see it in the Tanguma murals.
Although the DIA conspiracies have branched off into wild ideological directions, they’re all rooted in a 1996 radio interview with Alex Christopher, an interview whose transcription has been republished on hundreds of websites. Many theorists surmise that the man quoted in this transcription is dead.
Actually, Christopher is a 65-year-old grandmother living in Alabama.
Christopher first became interested in the New World Order in the mid-’80s, and she started writing a book on the subject. In the mid-’90s, she came to Denver for the Global Sciences Congress conference, where she gave a lecture on her theories about aliens and the globalist agenda. People there were talking about how odd the long-delayed airport was, “and I started looking at all the murals and floors and weirdness,” she remembers. “I got really intrigued.”
At the conference, she met people who she claims took her into DIA’s underground tunnels. The first time, she went with a man who worked there. “It was really spooky,” she remembers. Then she returned with fellow conspiracy theorist Phil Schneider, and they went down four levels.
That was enough to convince Christopher that something funny was going on at DIA. “As far as I know, I’m the one who started all that,” she acknowledges.
She went with a few family members to visit Tanguma at his studio, where he was working on the second mural. “And I asked him, ‘Where on earth are you coming up with this material from?’ And he said, ‘Well, it’s just a collection, a collage.’ And he had a lot of books in his studio that had strange pictures,” she remembers.
“I understand that he didn’t have free rein on those things,” Christopher continues. “He was given an outline of what was supposed to be in the murals. And I tried to talk to him about what I thought, and he wasn’t buying it at all. Evidently he was bought and paid for, because there was no talking to him. And his mind was totally shut down to what he was depicting.”
Christopher, on the other hand, was open to hearing anything. A man called her and said he had found an elevator at DIA that led to a corridor that led all the way down into a military base that also contained alien-operated concentration camps. She detailed this theory in her next book, Pandora’s Box II, and in 1996 was a guest on an esoteric California radio show hosted by Dave Alan. There she outlined her theory that the British secretly control the United States, as shown in the “secret society” symbolism of the Tanguma murals.
But then Phil Schneider turned up dead — officials determined it was a suicide, but conspiracy theorists recognized it as an assassination, and he has since become a martyr for underground-base believers. Christopher became fearful for her life and her children’s safety. “And so for them, I shut up and disappeared and decided to see if somebody would take the material and let it take on a life of its own so that their focus would be somewhere else,” she says.
And Christopher has tried to stay hidden, which has led to even more conspiracies. “Everybody thinks I’m dead or they think I’m a man,” she says. “My daughter and I have a real good chuckle over it.” But she’s grown tired of how “notorious” her KSCO interview has become, as others pick apart and misquote her work to serve their own conspiracy-theory agendas.
She’s now working on an updated version of her books, which she says may even include a DVD containing photographic proof of DIA’s underground labyrinth.
While the Tanguma murals appear in all DIA conspiracies, the pieces themselves are not the root of the airport obsession. Every good conspiracy theory needs a foundation of fact or a pre-existing controversy as its framework. And in this case, the theories all build off the origins of DIA, which seem bizarre enough on their own: an airport built absurdly far off into the prairie, on a massive piece of land, billions of dollars over budget, years late, with a high-tech baggage system that never worked. An airport that critics say was never needed in the first place.
Since it first opened in 1929 as Denver Municipal Airport in the northeast corner of the city, Stapleton Airport had steadily grown in both size and capacity. But commercial and residential development around the airport made new construction so cramped that jets were forced to taxi through underpasses built below I-70 to access certain runways. Talk of building a new airport at a different location started as early as the 1960s and continued through the mayoral administration of Bill McNichols, who commissioned a study of new sites. When Federico Peña took over as mayor in 1983, he thought that expanding Stapleton onto the adjacent Rocky Mountain Arsenal might be a better alternative. But the costs of cleaning up the contaminated site and opposition from Adams County sunk that idea. Meanwhile, Park Hill residents were growing increasingly angry over airport noise and pollution and even filed a lawsuit in hopes of prompting a relocation.
Peña knew that building a new airport would not be easy. But with the support of then-governor Roy Romer and other high-profile boosters from the civic and business world, Peña was able to work out a complicated deal that would allow the annexation of a large swath of farmland northeast of Denver. Despite a strong opposition campaign, the arrangement was approved by both Adams County and Denver voters in the late ’80s.
From the beginning, plans for DIA were ambitious. Peña, who now works in the local office of an international investment company, says he wanted the airport to make a “bold statement across the world” that would put Colorado on the global map. And the scale of DIA reflected this desire: It was to be the largest, most modern airport in the world. But almost as soon as ground was broken in 1989, problems cropped up. The massive public-works project was encumbered by design changes, difficult airline negotiations, allegations of cronyism in the contracting process, rumors of mismanagement and real troubles with the $700 million (and eventually abandoned) automated baggage system. Peña’s successor, Wellington Webb, was forced to push back the 1993 opening date three times. By the time DIA finally opened in February 1995, the original $1.5 billion cost had grown to $5.2 billion. Three months after that opening, the Congressional Subcommittee on Aviation held a special hearing on DIA in which one member said the Denver airport represented the “worst in government inefficiency, political behind-the-scenes deal-making, and financial mismanagement.” But Peña, who by then was serving as the Secretary of Transportation for President Bill Clinton, testified that despite the project’s shortcomings, more cities would need to construct world-class airports in the future.
Peña knows all about the statistics — but he hadn’t heard about any of the DIA conspiracies. They “have no basis in fact,” he asserts, but still manages to put them in a positive light, suggesting that it’s a compliment that Denver International Airport has attracted so much interest. “If it were a boring architectural structure, if it were a minor cog in the complex system of aviation traffic around the world, it probably wouldn’t get very much attention from anybody,” he says. “So in a way, I would think of this as a somewhat interesting observation that people make of DIA, which means that people give it a lot of importance, which it deserves. So I think it’s good in that sense.”
DIA spokesman Chuck Cannon has heard all about the DIA conspiracies. He’s been getting questions about the underground bases and the airport’s connection to the New World Order since before DIA opened, at a rate of about one a month. And his response hasn’t changed over the years. With all of the intense public and media scrutiny of the airport project, he asks, how could these supposed underground facilities have been built without somebody seeing them or reporting them?
“Sometimes these conspiracies are fun to read about, but they’re hokum; they just don’t hold water,” Cannon says. “And the people who say they’ve been out here and worked on the project and saw all of this stuff being built are smoking something stronger than what they can buy at their local supermarket.”
The strangest theories he’s heard are that the capstone in the main hall is a beacon for the mothership, and that underneath the basement is a camp for political prisoners. “When I tell them it’s bunk, they say, ‘Well, of course you’d say that. You work there. You’re part of the conspiracy, too!’” he says. “Well, if they think that’s true, why did they bother calling me?”
No one has bothered to call Charles Ansbacher, now the conductor of the Boston Landmarks Orchestra, which gives free classical concerts at public landmarks around the Boston area. But as the co-chair of the now-defunct New World Airport Commission, which orchestrated DIA’s opening festivities, Ansbacher would be a prime candidate for the conspiracists’ Illuminati puppet master. Back in 1990, the longtime arts advocate was living in Denver and working as an aesthetic design-policy advisor for DIA when he decided to start a not-for-profit organization that would help promote the new airport to the people of Denver, and enlisted big-name corporate and civic names to serve on the board.
Ansbacher can’t quite remember how he came up with the name for the organization, but he guesses it might have come from Dvorák’s New World Symphony. The New World Airport Commission name emphasized that DIA was the newest airport in the world, and the first new airport built in this country since Dallas/Fort Worth in 1973, he says; it did not symbolize that DIA was a monument to the New World Order. “The idea that there is anything secretive about this is totally preposterous,” Ansbacher says.
The group’s main function was to plan both an air show and a public gala in 1993, which went on despite the fact that the airport was delayed. He was there the day the capstone, which is also a time capsule, was dedicated. The Masonic symbol was placed on the stone because it was provided by a local Masonic lodge. “One of the remaining things they do is provide time capsules,” he points out.
Ansbacher was also a force behind the plan to make art a pervasive part of the new airport. With a budget of more than $7 million, DIA’s art program grew into the largest single-facility public-art program in the nation. “We are definitely not a Greyhound bus depot,” says Colleen Fanning, DIA art program manager. “We’re not just a bland environment. We have a transitory public that oftentimes has a little bit of time to spend as they make their way through security. We definitely want to enhance and humanize our spaces here at the airport and just beautify the experience.”
From the beginning of the design process, an effort was made to infuse art into the architecture, with 39 artists chosen to create original work for the project. These artists were selected by a committee of public officials, community members and working artists. There was a major cultural component to pieces chosen, and the committee was careful to include work by black, Native American and Hispanic artists. Still, there was no specific slot for a Mayan artist — which Jay Weidner insists Tanguma is.
Fanning has gotten calls about Tanguma’s art, including one last year from a person who accused the airport of changing portions of his murals to cover up secret meanings. “They basically scream at me and ask me why we have taken those murals down, but they’ve never been changed or been taken down,” she says. “Those murals will be there for a while. They’re not coming down.”
In fact, DIA will soon be getting more art. The airport will undergo $1.2 billion in infrastructure improvements over the next ten years, and under the city’s one-percent-for-art program that requires all capital improvement projects to allocate that percentage of the budget to art, Fanning’s program should get a significant boost.
And so the conspiracy calls will keep coming. “And really, there is nothing controversial here at all,” Fanning insists. “I really don’t give credence to any of the thinking that goes behind these theories.”
Weidner does. He visited DIA while working on his documentary and checked out the Tanguma murals. “I don’t know where he is,” Weidner says of the artist. “Last I heard, he was in Chicago; that’s all I could find out. I know he was commissioned to do the murals, and I know he was told pretty much what to paint. And that’s all I know. He’s pretty much just gone away.”
Leo Tanguma, a quiet man with a gray goatee, hasn’t moved from Colorado since DIA opened. Right now he’s standing in front of “The Children of the World Dream of Peace,” describing his work while travelers scurry past.
“This is my daughter’s friend,” he says, pointing to the children’s faces. “That’s my niece. Here’s my other niece. This is my granddaughter, Sandiana. This is my other granddaughter.” Other faces belong to friends of the family, neighbors, relatives. Some were victims of gang violence. “This little boy was at the zoo with his parents. At the zoo! And somebody was having a war in the neighborhood, and one of those bullets came in the air and paralyzed him,” Tanguma says. “It took him one year to die. So when I met the parents, I went to their home, and they gave me his photographs.”
The children represent a wide assortment of nationalities: “Panama. Brazil. Greece. Arabia. Sweden. Czech Republic.” The mural is about kids dreaming of a world without violence, he explains, with the dream turning into a rainbow that leads to children of all nations putting down their weapons by beating swords into plowshares.
Tanguma grew up in a small town in Texas, where Latinos were in the minority. He created his first mural when he was in the fifth grade and the local sheriff shot and killed three of his cousins in a questionable incident. He got up and went to the blackboard to draw what he liked to draw: horses, lions and tigers. “But this kid, somebody, said, ‘Draw me killing the sheriff.’ We were totally helpless in those days.” So he drew the kid stabbing the sheriff. And then the teacher walked in. He got a few licks for his depiction.
“But somebody asked me to do that art,” he remembers. “And in my life, I always felt that the community needed somebody to express its feelings.”
He only finished school through the sixth grade. Later, he joined the military. While overseas, he got his GED and took a cartooning correspondence course. Once out of the service, Tanguma went to Texas Southern University in 1972, where he’d paint community-center walls or street murals for small commissions. His murals can now be found on the walls of elementary schools, college campuses, housing projects, churches and art museums across the western U.S.
Tanguma moved to Colorado in 1983 because he thought there would be more opportunity here. The first piece he did in town was a mural in response to gang violence, paid for with small donations from churches and neighbors.
In 1993, Tanguma got a $100,000 commission for DIA. Initially, it was for one mural — but as he started painting, he decided to do more. “I wanted it to live up to how I felt about Denver, for the opportunity,” he says. He insists that he was given no guidelines for what to paint, and it took him three years to finish the work. “I tried to paint according to my conscience. Because I told the committee I tried not to paint just for decoration. It has to have a meaning.”
But meaning is created by the viewer as much as the artist. And it’s not just conspiracy theorists who find unintended meaning in the murals. Tanguma remembers how passersby would question his work even while he was finishing it on the walls at DIA. One man complained that the Scottish boy’s shawl had the crest of an enemy of his clan, so Tanguma included the man’s family crest on the shawl. Others wondered why the multi-racial murals didn’t have more black people, or white people, or why one country’s flag seemed to be covering another’s.
No matter how big the murals, no matter how inclusive the content, viewers always seem able to find a subtext, a code that explains the chaos now common in the new world.
Tanguma’s murals have even traveled from the world of fictional fact into outright fiction. In Forever Conceal, Never Reveal, a novel published online in 2005, Washington-based author Dawn Meier wrote about a character who got sucked into the Masonic underworld and traveled to DIA in one scene:
“How on earth did the city of Denver approve of such horrific murals in their airport?” Aaron asked.
“They really didn’t have anything to say about it. Freedom of speech; freedom of expression in art; all the freedom arguments allowed the Masons to influence all the murals you see. Here is another one.” They moved on to the next one.
“Oh, Gordon. How horrible. I can’t believe my eyes; a dark green giant monster wearing what looks like a gas mask, destroying a city. And what are these? It looks like women carrying dead babies. What sick person drew all these?”
“It doesn’t matter who drew them, Aaron. This is the future.”
Tanguma says he would like to “have a chance to meet with those folks and explain to them what I meant by this. I’m not part of any conspiracy whatsoever. I mean, it’s weird to be saying that. In general, this is about humanity. What could they find bad about this?”
An African woman in colorful native garb; a Native American woman who’s heritage the airport’s art supposedly celebrates; a blonde girl with cupid bow lips, a Star of David on her chest and a bible in her hands. Each lay dead in open coffins for your viewing pleasure. A burning city, children sleeping on piles of bricks, a line of mourning women in rags with dead babies, limp in their arms. A huge, looming military figure in a gas mask brandishes a sword and machine gun. Part of an actual note written by a child interred in a Nazi death camp. Strange words embedded in the floor with no explanation about what they mean. Welcome to Denver Internatinal Airport!That’s just the part you see up close, though. What you don’t see are 8 sub-basements, low- and high- frequency sounds that make people sick, air vents jutting out of the surrounding barren acres of fenced lots that have barbed wire along their tops – pointing in. Whole buildings that were constructed below ground level and then buried as is, the excuse being they were “built wrong”. An entire runway constructed, then buried under a layer of dirt and “forgotten”. The layers of workers and companies who were fired so no one would have a Big Picture. And workers even reported seeing Aliens working there. Are you rolling your eyes and going, “Oh sure..Nazis? Aliens, too huh? CRIPES”. Well, I have to admit when I got to that part I did, too. But there’s a lot of credible stories about a lot of documented things, so we can start there. With the dead babies and buried buildings. As far as Reptilian NWO and Nazis…I’ll mention it…ok? As far as the place being something Not Right Under There, I’m convinced. Except you’ll have to take my word for some of it because when I re-researched things to update this section..well! It seems they painted over two of the four walls that make up this sick mural and altered part of one that’s still there. But of course, I have pics, and so do a lot of others.
Part One: The Airport
The airport was built in 1995 on 34,000 acres (53 square miles; 137.593 Sq.km) in spite of the fact that Denver already had what everyone said was a perfectly fine airport – Stapleton – which was ordered closed when DIA was built so there “wouldn’t be any competition”. In fact the new airport has less gates and less runways than Stapleton did (I hope you’re saying, “That makes no sense”…). All it does have is a lot more acreage. More acreage than an airport that size could possibly need. Most which sits unused. They say it’s in case they need to do any future expansion. DIA is the 7th busiest airport in the US according to a 2002 Crain’s Chicago Business report.
The initial cost of this New Beast was to be 1.7 billion dollars (with a “B”) but by the time they were done playing games, having problems, getting bailed out and got extra government money (and money from private corporations on top of that), it cost about $4.8 billion – obscenely over budget. I have yet to meet a local who wanted the thing built, or didn’t have a frothing, rabid story about the whole mess. Words used to describe the DIA were “buried in technical problems”, “poor project management”, “overwhelming complexity” and “America’s most inconvenient airport“. It was built in a high wind area (Stapleton hadn’t been) that causes it to be shut down or flights delayed often. The extensive automated baggage system so was messed up, such a circus of errors that it was worse than unusable – it was an industry joke. But it had to be built, and built there. Some say the reason that this was built and there was no stopping it, no cost spared to do so and why it was so SO overbudget and took so many years is because it’s really an underground military base and a civilian detainment camp.
Some interesting facts:
- Even though the area is basically flat (with a stunning view of mountains all around, since it’s in a valley), the expense and time was taken to extensively lower some areas and raise others. They moved 110 million cubic yards of earth around. This is about 1/3rd of the amount of earth they moved when they dug out the Panama Canal.
- The airport has a fiber optic communications core made of 5,300 miles of cable. That’s longer than the Nile River. That’s from New York City to Buenos Aires, Argentina. The airport also has 11,365 miles of copper cable communications network.
- The fueling system can pump 1,000 gallons of jet fuel per minute through a 28-mile network of pipes. There are six fuel hold tanks that each hold 2.73 million gallons of jet fuel. This is somewhere in the “no one will ever ever need this much” range.
- Granite was imported from all over the world – Asia, Africa, Europe, North and South America – and used in making the main terminal floor. This is a ridiculous expense, especially when you’re already over budget. They say, “The floor pattern echoes the roof design and subtly reinforces passenger flows”. Ah…subliminal messages to move your ass. It might look pretty but would any of us know Chilean granite from Chinese granite? Or care? You can dye rock if it’s colors you’re after. Cheaper rocks. (I wonder what the “stones have power” people say about this…)
- The huge, main terminal is Jeppesen Terminal, named after Elfrey Jeppesen, who was the first person to create maps specifically for aviation (the company is still in business today). This area is known as the “Great Hall”; it’s said this is what the Masons name their meeting place.
It is 900 feet by 210 feet big. This is over 1.5 million square feet of space. All told, there is over 6 million square feet of public space at DIA. The airport brags that they have room to build another terminal and two more concourses and could serve 100 million passengers a year. The airport flew 36 million in 2001.
- The only way to get to the other two concourses/terminals from the Great Hall, or vice versa, is via the airport’s train system.
- There are more than 19 miles (30 km) of conveyor belt track, luggage transport cars and road in their own underground tunnels that move baggage and goods. They’re so huge you can drive trucks through them, and some remain unused.
- The entire roof of DIA is made of 15 acres of Teflon-coated, woven fiber glass. The same material is on the inside as a layer, also. The place looks like a bizarre (but kind of cool) scene out of “Dune”, comprised of huge, spiked tent-like structures. The material reflects 90% of the sunlight and doesn’t conduct heat. So you can’t see into the place with radar or see heat signatures. I added helpfully.
And as I poked around I found some lovely, light reading entitled:
“Technology for the United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2000-2035
Becoming a 21st-Century Force”
Volume 9: Modeling and Simulation
3 Potential Failures and Disasters for DOD’s M&S
Broad Observations: Intellectual and Technological Infrastructure
Complex Systems and the Need for Humility”
“Technology for the United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2000-2035
Becoming a 21st-Century Force”
Volume 9: Modeling and Simulation
3 Potential Failures and Disasters for DOD’s M&S
Broad Observations: Intellectual and Technological Infrastructure
Complex Systems and the Need for Humility”
…”The study’s terms of reference (Appendix A) asked for an identification of “present and emerging technologies that relate to the full breadth of Navy and Marine Corps mission capabilities,” with specific attention to “(1) information warfare, electronic warfare, and the use of surveillance assets;………The study should review the overall architecture of models and simulation in the DoD(DoN, JCS, and OSD),the ability of the models to represent real world situations, and their merits as tools upon which to make technical and force composition decisions….This increased complexity means that it will be harder to design systems and to predict their behavior. Some might argue that in the engineering domain, modern design tools should overcome these difficulties. While there certainly have been impressive advances (e.g., in computer-aided design), there is a feeling with at least some members of the engineering community interviewed in the course of the study that they have nearly reached the limits of complexity that can be addressed with current tools and methods. Challenging examples that could lie beyond current approaches include future generation networks and very large scale integrated circuits. Indications of the difficulty of building complex engineering systems are given by some of the well-known “disasters”-explosion of the Ariane missile, inability to build a next-generation air-traffic control system, outages in telephone and power systems, and even the problems with the baggage handling system at the Denver airport.”
Perhaps the DIA does push the “limit of complexity” but that’s only because the politicians and government designed it to be such a complex monster. It’s not as if some engineering problem was posed and met like the Chunnel, the Petrova Towers in Malaysia, the Burj Al Arab hotel in Dubai or a hydroelectric dam. Why would the military give a hoot about the baggage problems the airport had? If you believe what you are told in the papers, most of the problem was because the people who built the system weren’t the ones that were awarded the contract to run the thing. Hardly any “engineering” snafu. Or did their billion dollar underground base not work out as good as they had hoped?
More News hereQuantum Science News (Science News)
News Just For You (World News)
I AM AWAKE NEWS (Globalist News)
UF0 NEWS (Paranormal News)
Cyber Network News (Internet News)
Eviland (Ghost / Paranormal)
FML (Funny Viralo Videos)
Zombie Games (Flash Games)
Eviland (Ghost / Paranormal)
FML (Funny Viralo Videos)
Zombie Games (Flash Games)
Please Support my Blogs
Help me Keep them Running